University of Borås

Borås Academic Digital Archive (BADA) >
Studentuppsatser & examensarbeten / Student Papers >
Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / Swedish School of Library and Information Science >
Magisteruppsatser (BHS) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2320/14739

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
mag14_11.pdf545.57 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Ragnar Edenmans kulturpolitiska problematisering: styrning av estetisk bildning och estetisk miljö i statlig socialdemokratisk kulturpolitik 1957-67
Other Titles: Ragnar Edenman’s problematization of cultural policy: Government of aesthetic education and aesthetic environment in the socialdemocratic cultural policy for the state 1957-67
Authors: Holmberg, Magnus
Department: Högskolan i Borås/Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap (BHS)
Issue Date: 29-Jan-2015
Series/Report no.: Magisteruppsats
2014:11
Programme: Bibliotekarie
Publisher: University of Borås/Swedish School of Library and Information Science (SSLIS)
Media type: text
Keywords: Statlig kulturpolitik
Ragnar Edenman
Socialdemokratisk kulturpolitik
Estetisk fostran
Miljöbegrepp
Folkbildningshistoria
Utbildningshistoria
Regementalitet
Abstract: This master’s thesis analyzes how cultural policy was problematized in three governmental policy areas; cultural policy for the free sector, education policy and popular education policy, during the social democrat Ragnar Edenman’s time (1957-67) as minister of ecclesiastical affairs. Earlier research has examined the policy for the free sector, concerning artist’s economic problems. This thesis adds an analysis of the other fields of policy, which were reformed in the 1960’s by the same ministry. The purpose is twofold: first to examine if the two fields were problematized as a cultural policy. The conclusion is that popular education was part of what Edenman problematized as a “wider cultural policy”. Education policy was not included in this field of reform, but not conceptually different from it. Secondly to examine what these three policies had in common as a problematization. This concept is combined with the concept of governmentality into an analysis of how wider cultural policy was defined by two technologies, aesthetic education and environment. These elements are analyzed in programs for these fields of policy, their use of behavioral sciences and ideological programs after 1946. The conclusion is that the wider problematization during the early part of the period was part of a governmentality held together by a psychologically defined democratic subject. When cultural policy was defined as a separate field of policy in the 1960’s, it lost contact with this governmentality’s focus on the citizen’s ethical behavior. Instead, its purpose was to fulfill goals of the citizen’s wellbeing in society.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2320/14739
ISSN: 1654-0247
Appears in Collections:Magisteruppsatser (BHS)

SFX Query

All items in Borås Academic Digital Archive are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  The DSpace Foundation